Scoringwt 20 · 1/1 metricsSeattle Seahawks
Arizona Cardinals-50Seattle Seahawks
Arizona Cardinals's scoring offense (#21) faces Seattle Seahawks's scoring defense (#7). Seattle Seahawks's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Arizona Cardinals's offense difficult to sustain.
Seattle Seahawks's scoring offense (#15) faces Arizona Cardinals's scoring defense (#32). This is a major statistical advantage for Seattle Seahawks's offense against a much lower-ranked defensive unit.
These rankings compare points scored per game versus points allowed per game.
Rushingwt 15 · 1/2 metricsArizona Cardinals
Arizona Cardinals26Seattle Seahawks
Yards per carry (offense): Arizona Cardinals averages 4.2 yards per carry (#16), compared with Seattle Seahawks at 3.9 yards per carry (#24). That is about 0.3 more yards per carry for Arizona Cardinals, supporting an advantage in rushing efficiency.
Passingwt 15 · 1/2 metricsSeattle Seahawks
Arizona Cardinals-55Seattle Seahawks
Yards per attempt (offense): Arizona Cardinals averages 5.8 yards per pass attempt (#30), compared with Seattle Seahawks at 7.3 yards per pass attempt (#13). That is about 1.5 more yards per pass attempt for Seattle Seahawks, supporting an advantage in passing efficiency.
Drive efficiencywt 15 · 2/3 metricsNo clear edge
Arizona Cardinals-4Seattle Seahawks
Arizona Cardinals's third-down offense (#16) faces Seattle Seahawks's third-down defense (#3). Seattle Seahawks's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Arizona Cardinals's offense difficult to sustain.
Seattle Seahawks's third-down offense (#27) faces Arizona Cardinals's third-down defense (#15). Arizona Cardinals's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Seattle Seahawks's offense in this area.
These rankings compare third-down conversion rate versus the rate allowed to opponents.
Arizona Cardinals's red-zone touchdown offense (#32) faces Seattle Seahawks's red-zone touchdown defense (#29). This is weakness against weakness: both units rank in the bottom 30%, so neither brings a strong season-long profile to this comparison.
Seattle Seahawks's red-zone touchdown offense (#23) faces Arizona Cardinals's red-zone touchdown defense (#25). This is weakness against weakness: both units rank in the bottom 30%, so neither brings a strong season-long profile to this comparison.
These rankings compare the share of red-zone trips ending in a touchdown versus the rate allowed to opponents.
Explosive playswt 10 · 1/1 metricsSeattle Seahawks
Arizona Cardinals-40Seattle Seahawks
Arizona Cardinals's big-play offense (#28) faces Seattle Seahawks's big-play defense (#1). Seattle Seahawks's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Arizona Cardinals's offense difficult to sustain.
Seattle Seahawks's big-play offense (#19) faces Arizona Cardinals's big-play defense (#17). The rankings are close, with no clear statistical separation in this matchup.
These rankings compare 20+ yard plays made per game versus 20+ yard plays allowed per game.
Pass protection / pressurewt 10 · 1/1 metricsNo clear edge
Arizona Cardinals-3Seattle Seahawks
Arizona Cardinals's pass protection (#20) faces Seattle Seahawks's pass rush (#15). Seattle Seahawks's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Arizona Cardinals's offense in this area.
Seattle Seahawks's pass protection (#18) faces Arizona Cardinals's pass rush (#15). The rankings are close, with no clear statistical separation in this matchup.
These rankings compare sacks allowed per game versus sacks made per game; rank 1 is best for both.
Turnover marginwt 5 · 0/1 metricsNot enough data
Not collected or not broadly ranked; no advantage is assigned.
Field-goal efficiencywt 5 · 0/1 metricsNot enough data
Not collected or not broadly ranked; no advantage is assigned.
Schedule contextwt 5 · 0/1 metricsNot enough data
Not collected; no schedule advantage is assigned.