WEEKLY SLATE / NFL 2026

Week 9 - 11/05 thru 11/09

15 games / 30 teams

LeagueSeasonWeek

NFL teams A–Z Player pages · including bye teams

2026 · Week 9. Player pages use scheduled nflverse collection, or a manually imported companion when supplied. No game listed can mean a bye or missing schedule data.

	Score						SOS A/H	Weather	Flags
Jacksonville Jaguars5-2@ Baltimore Ravens4-4	——	Thu, 11/0520:15 ET	Jacksonville Jaguars -10	40.5	1012	1416	----	OK68F / 3 mph	INJ 24
Cincinnati Bengals5-2vs Atlanta Falcons3-5	——	Sun, 11/0809:30 ET	Cincinnati Bengals -3	52.5	723	2818	----	Unavailable — outside NWS coverage	NEUINJ 25
Cleveland Browns5-3@ New Orleans Saints2-5	——	Sun, 11/0813:00 ET	New Orleans Saints -1.5	43	2422	1727	----	INIndoor	INJ 10
Dallas Cowboys3-5@ Indianapolis Colts2-6	——	Sun, 11/0813:00 ET	Dallas Cowboys -6	51.5	1927	2920	----	Roof may be closed56F / 8 mph	INJ 23
Denver Broncos6-2@ Carolina Panthers3-4	——	Sun, 11/0813:00 ET	Denver Broncos -3	43.5	325	2619	----	OK65F / 3 mph	INJ 18
Detroit Lions5-2@ Miami Dolphins1-6	——	Sun, 11/0813:00 ET	Detroit Lions -7	50.5	129	3215	----	OK82F / 5 mph	INJ 24
Los Angeles Rams4-4@ Washington Commanders2-4-1	——	Sun, 11/0813:00 ET	Los Angeles Rams -5.5	47.5	420	321	----	OK60F / 8 mph	INJ 25
New York Giants4-2-1@ Philadelphia Eagles2-6	——	Sun, 11/0813:00 ET	New York Giants -3	40	1330	625	----	OK59F / 5 mph	INJ 20
New York Jets2-6@ Kansas City Chiefs5-2	——	Sun, 11/0813:00 ET	Kansas City Chiefs -9.5	46.5	146	117	----	OK61F / 5 mph	INJ 21
Houston Texans2-5@ Los Angeles Chargers0-7	——	Sun, 11/0816:05 ET	Houston Texans -4.5	40.5	1625	239	----	INIndoor	INJ 9
Las Vegas Raiders4-4@ San Francisco 49ers6-1	——	Sun, 11/0816:05 ET	San Francisco 49ers -10	52	189	315	----	OK72F / 3 mph	INJ 11
Arizona Cardinals3-5@ Seattle Seahawks4-4	——	Sun, 11/0816:25 ET	Seattle Seahawks -11	42	1715	221	----	OK55F / 12 mph	INJ 36
Green Bay Packers5-3@ New England Patriots5-3	——	Sun, 11/0816:25 ET	New England Patriots -3	47	218	1311	----	OK57F / 5 mph	INJ 22
Tampa Bay Buccaneers3-5@ Chicago Bears6-2	——	Sun, 11/0820:20 ET	Chicago Bears -6	46.5	262	28	----	OK50F / 5 mph	INJ 16
Buffalo Bills6-1@ Minnesota Vikings6-1	——	Mon, 11/0920:15 ET	Buffalo Bills -3	46	328	244	----	INIndoor	INJ 20

Click a row for full analytics. Rank tiers by percentile of 32 NFL teams: dark green top 18%, green 36%, gray 64%, orange 82%, red below. Data: nflverse; NFL data belong to their respective owners. "--" = not collected.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Chicago Bears / ESC TO CLOSE

Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Chicago Bears: Week 9 Matchup Breakdown

MATCHUP ANALYSIS · Tampa Bay Buccaneers vs Chicago Bears

11/08 · 20:20 ET

NFC South

Tampa Bay Buccaneers3-5AWAY

NFC North

Chicago Bears6-2HOME

Point spreadChicago Bears -6The Odds API · Updated 11/03, 4:17 PM EST

Over / under46.5The Odds API · Updated 11/03, 4:17 PM EST

Game-time weatherMostly Clear50°F · 5 mph wind · forecast for 11/08, 8:20 PM EST · National Weather Service · Updated 11/03, 4:18 PM EST

Informational only · not an offer to wager · lines as of 11/03, 4:17 PM EST

OVERALL MATCHUP SUMMARYSLIGHT STATISTICAL LEAN

Slight statistical edge: Chicago Bears

Chicago Bears has the stronger available statistical profile, led by passing and pass protection / pressure. Tampa Bay Buccaneers's clearest counterpoint is rushing. This describes the data, not a predicted winner.

Data coveragePartial61% of planned weight

How much of the comparison had usable stats. Not a win probability.

SampleTampa Bay Buccaneers: 8 profile games · Chicago Bears: 8 profile games6 of 9 factors scored

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: injury report carried from 2026 Week 8; statuses have not been re-confirmed. Chicago Bears: injury report carried from 2026 Week 8; statuses have not been re-confirmed.

When each team has the ball

Tampa Bay Buccaneers offense

Tampa Bay Buccaneers's pass protection (#22) faces Chicago Bears's pass rush (#7). Chicago Bears's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense difficult to sustain.

Tampa Bay Buccaneers's third-down offense (#19) faces Chicago Bears's third-down defense (#1). Chicago Bears's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense difficult to sustain.

Edge: Chicago Bears

Chicago Bears offense

Chicago Bears's pass protection (#18) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's pass rush (#22). The rank gap gives Chicago Bears's offense a favorable statistical matchup.

However, Chicago Bears's red-zone touchdown offense (#18) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's red-zone touchdown defense (#9). Tampa Bay Buccaneers's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Chicago Bears's offense in this area.

No Statistical Edge

Key factors to watch

Scoring
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's scoring offense (#20) faces Chicago Bears's scoring defense (#8). Chicago Bears's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense in this area.
Chicago Bears's scoring offense (#8) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's scoring defense (#5). This is strength against strength: both units rank in the top 30%, making this a test of two strong season-long profiles.
These rankings compare points scored per game versus points allowed per game.
Slight Edge: Chicago Bears
Passing
Yards per attempt (offense): Tampa Bay Buccaneers averages 5.7 yards per pass attempt (#32), compared with Chicago Bears at 7.4 yards per pass attempt (#12). That is about 1.7 more yards per pass attempt for Chicago Bears, supporting an advantage in passing efficiency.
Edge: Chicago Bears
Rushing
Yards per carry (offense): Tampa Bay Buccaneers averages 5.1 yards per carry (#2), compared with Chicago Bears at 4.3 yards per carry (#13). That is about 0.8 more yards per carry for Tampa Bay Buccaneers, supporting an advantage in rushing efficiency.
Edge: Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Pass protection / pressure
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's pass protection (#22) faces Chicago Bears's pass rush (#7). Chicago Bears's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense difficult to sustain.
Chicago Bears's pass protection (#18) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's pass rush (#22). The rank gap gives Chicago Bears's offense a favorable statistical matchup.
These rankings compare sacks allowed per game versus sacks made per game; rank 1 is best for both.
Edge: Chicago Bears
Drive efficiency
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's third-down offense (#19) faces Chicago Bears's third-down defense (#1). Chicago Bears's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense difficult to sustain.
Chicago Bears's third-down offense (#5) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's third-down defense (#5). This is strength against strength: both units rank in the top 30%, making this a test of two strong season-long profiles.
These rankings compare third-down conversion rate versus the rate allowed to opponents.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's red-zone touchdown offense (#29) faces Chicago Bears's red-zone touchdown defense (#18). Chicago Bears's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense in this area.
Chicago Bears's red-zone touchdown offense (#18) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's red-zone touchdown defense (#9). Tampa Bay Buccaneers's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Chicago Bears's offense in this area.
These rankings compare the share of red-zone trips ending in a touchdown versus the rate allowed to opponents.
Slight Edge: Chicago Bears
Explosive plays
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's big-play offense (#25) faces Chicago Bears's big-play defense (#15). Chicago Bears's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense in this area.
Chicago Bears's big-play offense (#2) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's big-play defense (#5). This is strength against strength: both units rank in the top 30%, making this a test of two strong season-long profiles.
These rankings compare 20+ yard plays made per game versus 20+ yard plays allowed per game.
Slight Edge: Chicago Bears

Situational context

Tampa Bay Buccaneers is 3-5 overall. Chicago Bears is 6-2 overall.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers is 2-1 on the road. Chicago Bears is 3-1 at home.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: previous opponent atl · 11/01 · home. Chicago Bears: previous opponent sea · 11/02 · away.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: 1 out / season-ending / doubtful entries in the last available injury report; Chicago Bears: 1 out / season-ending / doubtful entries in the last available injury report. No player-value adjustment is applied.
Weather forecast snapshot: Mostly Clear · 50°F · 5 mph wind · 12% precipitation chance. Check the weather update time; no numerical weather adjustment is applied.

Driver breakdown6/9 SCORED

Scoringwt 20 · 1/1 metricsChicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers-15Chicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's scoring offense (#20) faces Chicago Bears's scoring defense (#8). Chicago Bears's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense in this area.
Chicago Bears's scoring offense (#8) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's scoring defense (#5). This is strength against strength: both units rank in the top 30%, making this a test of two strong season-long profiles.
These rankings compare points scored per game versus points allowed per game.
Rushingwt 15 · 1/2 metricsTampa Bay Buccaneers
Tampa Bay Buccaneers35Chicago Bears
Yards per carry (offense): Tampa Bay Buccaneers averages 5.1 yards per carry (#2), compared with Chicago Bears at 4.3 yards per carry (#13). That is about 0.8 more yards per carry for Tampa Bay Buccaneers, supporting an advantage in rushing efficiency.
Passingwt 15 · 1/2 metricsChicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers-65Chicago Bears
Yards per attempt (offense): Tampa Bay Buccaneers averages 5.7 yards per pass attempt (#32), compared with Chicago Bears at 7.4 yards per pass attempt (#12). That is about 1.7 more yards per pass attempt for Chicago Bears, supporting an advantage in passing efficiency.
Drive efficiencywt 15 · 2/3 metricsChicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers-20Chicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's third-down offense (#19) faces Chicago Bears's third-down defense (#1). Chicago Bears's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense difficult to sustain.
Chicago Bears's third-down offense (#5) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's third-down defense (#5). This is strength against strength: both units rank in the top 30%, making this a test of two strong season-long profiles.
These rankings compare third-down conversion rate versus the rate allowed to opponents.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's red-zone touchdown offense (#29) faces Chicago Bears's red-zone touchdown defense (#18). Chicago Bears's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense in this area.
Chicago Bears's red-zone touchdown offense (#18) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's red-zone touchdown defense (#9). Tampa Bay Buccaneers's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Chicago Bears's offense in this area.
These rankings compare the share of red-zone trips ending in a touchdown versus the rate allowed to opponents.
Explosive playswt 10 · 1/1 metricsChicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers-21Chicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's big-play offense (#25) faces Chicago Bears's big-play defense (#15). Chicago Bears's defense has the stronger ranking here, which could limit Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense in this area.
Chicago Bears's big-play offense (#2) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's big-play defense (#5). This is strength against strength: both units rank in the top 30%, making this a test of two strong season-long profiles.
These rankings compare 20+ yard plays made per game versus 20+ yard plays allowed per game.
Pass protection / pressurewt 10 · 1/1 metricsChicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers-31Chicago Bears
Tampa Bay Buccaneers's pass protection (#22) faces Chicago Bears's pass rush (#7). Chicago Bears's defense has a major statistical advantage here and could make this part of Tampa Bay Buccaneers's offense difficult to sustain.
Chicago Bears's pass protection (#18) faces Tampa Bay Buccaneers's pass rush (#22). The rank gap gives Chicago Bears's offense a favorable statistical matchup.
These rankings compare sacks allowed per game versus sacks made per game; rank 1 is best for both.
Turnover marginwt 5 · 0/1 metricsNot enough data
Not collected or not broadly ranked; no advantage is assigned.
Field-goal efficiencywt 5 · 0/1 metricsNot enough data
Not collected or not broadly ranked; no advantage is assigned.
Schedule contextwt 5 · 0/1 metricsNot enough data
Not collected; no schedule advantage is assigned.

Method and limitations

Limitations

Missing or narrowly covered metrics are excluded. Their weights are not redistributed to the remaining metrics.
Tampa Bay Buccaneers: injury report carried from 2026 Week 8; statuses have not been re-confirmed.
Chicago Bears: injury report carried from 2026 Week 8; statuses have not been re-confirmed.

How this is computed

NFL EPA and success rates are additional profile context, not extra votes in this initial summary. NFL ranks are supplied across all 32 teams, including bye teams; unranked efficiency values are not assigned invented ranks. Red-zone rates in this file are TD percentages, not all-score percentages.
Rules-based comparison of the existing public nflverse pre-week profiles and original injury/context notes, with NWS weather context. No new provider or AI requests.
Rank strength = (teams ranked − rank) / (teams ranked − 1). A metric needs values and ranks for both teams and coverage of at least 80% of the NFL population. Rank 1 is best, including defense allowed and sacks allowed.
For each offense/defense metric: [(away offense strength − home defense strength) − (home offense strength − away defense strength)] / 2. Efficiency-only metrics compare the two teams directly.
Related metrics share a group weight: rushing/passing yardage receives twice the weight of yards per carry/attempt. Third down receives half of drive efficiency; red-zone score and TD percentages share the other half.
Weights: scoring 20%; rushing 15%; passing 15%; drive efficiency 15%; explosive plays 10%; pressure/protection 10%; turnover margin 5%; field goals 5%; schedule context 5%. Schedule uses the difference in opponents’ combined win rates.
Net comparison index: -11.8 on a −100 to +100 scale (positive favors Tampa Bay Buccaneers, negative Chicago Bears). Missing weights stay neutral rather than being redistributed. This is not a probability, projected margin or betting model.
Overall call requires 55% of planned scoring weight and three games per team. Under 4 index points is even; 4+ slight; 12+ moderate requires 65% coverage and four games; 25+ strong requires 85% coverage and five games. Incomplete profile samples are not scored.
Record, venue splits, total offense/defense ranks and AP polls are not added again because they overlap existing evidence. Possession time is style context, not inherently better. Injuries, rest, rivalry and weather receive no invented numerical adjustments.
Schedule context is not a true opponent-adjusted rating. This heuristic has not been calibrated against outcomes. Odds are not inputs. Informational only; not a wagering recommendation.

Descriptive comparison of season stats only. The score has not been validated as a predictor and is not a forecast of the result.

TEAM PROFILE

Side by side

TIERS OF 32 NFL TEAMS

Metric	Tampa Bay Buccaneers	Chicago Bears	Edge
Record	3-5	6-2	Chicago Bears
SOS rank	Not collected	Not collected	No call
Offense rank	#26 332.25 ypg	#2 422 ypg	Chicago Bears
Defense rank	#2 314.375 allowed	#8 337 allowed	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
ATS	Not collected	Not collected	No call
Rest / last game	Not collected 11/01 · atl · H	Not collected 11/02 · sea · A	No call
Venue record (away / home)	2-1	3-1	Chicago Bears
Next game	Not collected	Not collected	No call
Out / doubtful	1	1	Even
Season to date · completed games before this week · nflverse
Games in sample	8	8	—
Points / game	22.25 ppg20 of 32	26.75 ppg8 of 32	Chicago Bears
Points allowed / game	18.875 ppg5 of 32	20 ppg8 of 32	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Rushing yards / game	168.625 ydsrank not collected	150.75 ydsrank not collected	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Yards / carry	5.071428571428571 yds2 of 32	4.291814946619217 yds13 of 32	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Net passing yards / game	163.625 ydsrank not collected	271.25 ydsrank not collected	Chicago Bears
Net yards / pass attempt	5.666666666666667 yds32 of 32	7.380952380952381 yds12 of 32	Chicago Bears
3rd-down conversions	38.392857142857146%19 of 32	44.34782608695652%5 of 32	Chicago Bears
Red-zone scores	Not collected	Not collected	Not enough data
Red-zone TDs	53.57142857142857%29 of 32	62.5%18 of 32	Chicago Bears
Field goal %	100%rank not collected	76.5%rank not collected	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Explosive plays (20+) / game	2.87525 of 32	4.6252 of 32	Chicago Bears
Sacks made / game	222 of 32	2.757 of 32	Chicago Bears
Sacks allowed / game	2.87522 of 32	2.37518 of 32	Chicago Bears
Rush yards allowed / game	80 ydsrank not collected	86.75 ydsrank not collected	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Pass yards allowed / game	234.375 ydsrank not collected	250.25 ydsrank not collected	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
3rd-down conv. allowed	32%5 of 32	23.75%1 of 32	Chicago Bears
Red-zone scores allowed	Not collected	Not collected	Not enough data
Red-zone TDs allowed	56.52173913043478%9 of 32	65.51724137931035%18 of 32	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Explosive plays allowed / game	2.6255 of 32	3.515 of 32	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Turnover margin / game	Not collected	Not collected	Not enough data
Time of possession	Not collected	Not collected	Not enough data
Offensive EPA / play	-0.0939867631365923527 of 32	0.062929505223425159 of 32	Chicago Bears
Defensive EPA allowed / play	-0.157553111829159852 of 32	-0.0242180855984103812 of 32	Tampa Bay Buccaneers
Offensive success rate	40.936863543788185%25 of 32	47.34982332155477%8 of 32	Chicago Bears
Defensive success rate allowed	39.38730853391685%3 of 32	40.19607843137255%4 of 32	Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Historical matchup

Historical matchup not collected

Key player comparison

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Key players not collected

Chicago Bears

Key players not collected

Player and historical data: nflverse. Summaries as uploaded; missing periods marked Not collected.

POSSESSION MATCHUPS

Offense vs. Defense Comparison

2 POSSESSIONS

OFFENSE VS OPPOSING DEFENSE

When Tampa Bay Buccaneers has the ball

EDGE AT 15+ RANK GAP · #1 BEST

Tampa Bay Buccaneers offenseChicago Bears defense

22.25 ppg20 of 32

ScoringNo edge

20 ppg8 of 32

168.625 ydsrank not collected

Rushing yards / gameRanks not collected

86.75 ydsrank not collected

163.625 ydsrank not collected

Passing yards / gameRanks not collected

250.25 ydsrank not collected

38.392857142857146%19 of 32

Third downDefense edge · 18 spots

23.75%1 of 32

Not collected

Red-zone scoreRanks not collected

Not collected

53.57142857142857%29 of 32

Red-zone TDNo edge

65.51724137931035%18 of 32

2.87525 of 32

Explosive plays (20+)No edge

3.515 of 32

2.87522 of 32

Sacks allowed vs sacks madeDefense edge · 15 spots

2.757 of 32

OFFENSE VS OPPOSING DEFENSE

When Chicago Bears has the ball

EDGE AT 15+ RANK GAP · #1 BEST

Chicago Bears offenseTampa Bay Buccaneers defense

26.75 ppg8 of 32

ScoringNo edge

18.875 ppg5 of 32

150.75 ydsrank not collected

Rushing yards / gameRanks not collected

80 ydsrank not collected

271.25 ydsrank not collected

Passing yards / gameRanks not collected

234.375 ydsrank not collected

44.34782608695652%5 of 32

Third downNo edge

32%5 of 32

Not collected

Red-zone scoreRanks not collected

Not collected

62.5%18 of 32

Red-zone TDNo edge

56.52173913043478%9 of 32

4.6252 of 32

Explosive plays (20+)No edge

2.6255 of 32

2.37518 of 32

Sacks allowed vs sacks madeNo edge

222 of 32

SEASON PROFILE

Pace & Pressure

3 METRICS

Time of possession / game: Tampa Bay Buccaneers Not collected; Chicago Bears Not collected
Defensive sacks made / game: Tampa Bay Buccaneers 222 of 32; Chicago Bears 2.757 of 32
Offensive sacks allowed / game: Tampa Bay Buccaneers 2.87522 of 32; Chicago Bears 2.37518 of 32

SEASON PROFILE

Red Zone

3 METRICS

Red-zone scoring rate unavailable where the nflverse file records touchdowns only; field-goal trips cannot be inferred.

Offensive red-zone touchdown rate: Tampa Bay Buccaneers 53.57142857142857%29 of 32; Chicago Bears 62.5%18 of 32
Defensive red-zone touchdown rate allowed: Tampa Bay Buccaneers 56.52173913043478%9 of 32; Chicago Bears 65.51724137931035%18 of 32
Field-goal accuracy: Tampa Bay Buccaneers 100%rank not collected; Chicago Bears 76.5%rank not collected

SPECIAL TEAMS · NFLVERSE

Team Kicking

2 TEAMS

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Field goals (FGM/FGA): 19/19; Field-goal accuracy: 100%rank not collected
Chicago Bears: Field goals (FGM/FGA): 13/17; Field-goal accuracy: 76.5%rank not collected

AUTO-DETECTED CONTEXT

Flags

0 FLAGS

Betting flags from the uploaded file are private admin reference only.

Tampa Bay BuccaneersRest: Not collectedNext: Not collected

Chicago BearsRest: Not collectedNext: Not collected

PLAYER AVAILABILITY

Key Injuries

16 LISTED

Tampa Bay Buccaneers: Carried forward from 2026 Week 8 — awaiting a Week 9 update. Statuses have not been re-confirmed. Report date not supplied · checked 11/03, 3:21 PM EST. nflverse source (CC BY 4.0).

Chicago Bears: Carried forward from 2026 Week 8 — awaiting a Week 9 update. Statuses have not been re-confirmed. Report date not supplied · checked 11/03, 3:21 PM EST. nflverse source (CC BY 4.0).

Team	Pos	Status	Detail
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	DT	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	S	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	QB	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	RB	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	WR	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	WR	Out	Foot Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	LB	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	RB	Questionable	Hip Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	T	Questionable	Calf Source · Source date unknown
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	LB	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown

Chicago Bears	TE	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Chicago Bears	LB	Questionable	Ankle Source · Source date unknown
Chicago Bears	LB	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown
Chicago Bears	RB	Out	Thumb; Toe Source · Source date unknown
Chicago Bears	CB	Questionable	Toe Source · Source date unknown
Chicago Bears	LB	Practiced in full	Source · Source date unknown

SCHEDULE CONTEXT

Previous Opponents

FULL SEASON

Tampa Bay Buccaneers

Opponent	Date	Result	Line	ATS
@ Cincinnati Bengals	09/13	L 27-33	--	--
Cleveland Browns	09/20	L 19-23	--	--
Minnesota Vikings	09/27	L 16-23	--	--
Green Bay Packers	10/04	L 14-17	--	--
@ Dallas Cowboys	10/08	W 24-16	--	--
Pittsburgh Steelers	10/18	L 19-26	--	--
@ Carolina Panthers	10/25	W 43-13	--	--
Atlanta Falcons	11/01	W 16-0	--	--
@ Chicago Bears	11/08	--	--	--
@ Detroit Lions	11/22	--	--	--
Carolina Panthers	11/30	--	--	--
Los Angeles Chargers	12/06	--	--	--
@ Baltimore Ravens	12/13	--	--	--
New Orleans Saints	12/20	--	--	--
@ Atlanta Falcons	12/27	--	--	--
Los Angeles Rams	01/03/2027	--	--	--
@ New Orleans Saints	01/10/2027	--	--	--

Chicago Bears

Opponent	Date	Result	Line	ATS
@ Carolina Panthers	09/13	W 59-37	--	--
Minnesota Vikings	09/20	L 3-9	--	--
Philadelphia Eagles	09/28	W 27-7	--	--
New York Jets	10/04	W 23-12	--	--
@ Green Bay Packers	10/11	L 7-31	--	--
@ Atlanta Falcons	10/18	W 31-23	--	--
New England Patriots	10/22	W 30-24	--	--
@ Seattle Seahawks	11/02	W 34-17	--	--
Tampa Bay Buccaneers	11/08	--	--	--
New Orleans Saints	11/22	--	--	--
@ Detroit Lions	11/26	--	--	--
Jacksonville Jaguars	12/06	--	--	--
@ Miami Dolphins	12/13	--	--	--
@ Buffalo Bills	12/19	--	--	--
Green Bay Packers	12/25	--	--	--
Detroit Lions	01/03/2027	--	--	--
@ Minnesota Vikings	01/10/2027	--	--	--

Game context

GAME CONTEXT

Home field: Chicago Bears

12% precip

Tampa Bay Buccaneers travel

Home base: Time zone not collected. Game-venue time-zone comparison not collected.

Travel is context only, not a statistical advantage.

Unavailable figures are shown as “Not collected.” Rankings are national ranks where supplied.